Disclaimer

The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While we strive to keep the information accurate and up to date, Canadian immigration laws and policies are subject to change without notice. No visitor to this site should act or refrain from acting based on the content herein without first seeking appropriate professional advice from a licensed immigration consultant or lawyer.

Using this website or reading its content does not create a consultant–client relationship with Arrowhood Immigration Services Inc. If you have specific questions about your immigration situation, please contact us directly for a personalized consultation.

Federal Court Quashes Study Permit Refusal Over Unjustified Officer Decision
Tosin B Tosin B

Federal Court Quashes Study Permit Refusal Over Unjustified Officer Decision

In Ekong v. MCI (2025 FC 1355), the Federal Court found that an officer’s refusal of a Nigerian applicant’s study permit was unreasonable. The Court ruled the decision lacked a rational explanation and failed to consider key evidence showing the applicant’s strong ties to Nigeria, including her career, businesses, and teenage children. The case was sent back for a new decision by another officer.

Read More
Credibility at the Core
Federal Court Decisions Tosin B Federal Court Decisions Tosin B

Credibility at the Core

In the case of Abraham v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 70, the Federal Court's decision emphasizes the critical role of credibility in refugee claims. The court upheld the rejection of a refugee claim based on inconsistencies and omissions in the applicants' testimonies. Learn the key takeaways from this case, and how refugee applicants can strengthen their claims.

Read More
Denied Sanctuary: One Man's Fight for Refugee Status While His Family Finds Safety

Denied Sanctuary: One Man's Fight for Refugee Status While His Family Finds Safety

The path to refuge in Canada is rarely straightforward, and the recent Federal Court decision in Aslam v. Canada (Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship), 2025 FC 655, starkly illustrates this complexity. While his wife and children were granted the sanctuary they sought, Mr. Aslam's claim was denied based on the contentious concept of an Internal Flight Alternative (IFA). This case delves into the intricacies of IFA assessments, the stringent rules surrounding new evidence at the appeal stage, and the challenging reality faced by a self-represented litigant navigating Canada's refugee protection system. Join us as we explore the key takeaways from Aslam and what it means for individuals seeking safety and family unity in Canada.

Read More
Unseen Traps in Canadian Immigration: The Huang Case and Protecting Your Future

Unseen Traps in Canadian Immigration: The Huang Case and Protecting Your Future

A seemingly minor association can derail your Canadian dream. The recent Federal Court decision in Huang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 699 unveils the far-reaching implications of "membership" in organizations linked to criminal activity, even without a personal conviction. This eye-opening case underscores the absolute necessity of understanding these complex inadmissibility rules. For Arrowhead Immigration Services Inc., it reinforces our unwavering commitment to meticulous client guidance and proactive risk assessment, ensuring your journey to Canada is secure.

Read More
Shadows of the Past: The Francisque Immigration Case and Crimes Against Humanity
Tosin B Tosin B

Shadows of the Past: The Francisque Immigration Case and Crimes Against Humanity

The Federal Court, in a decision dated May 2, 2025, upheld the refusal of permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate (H&C) grounds for Renold Francisque, a citizen of Haiti. The crux of the matter? A prior self-declaration of affiliation with the notorious "TonTon Macoutes" (TM), a group with a dark history of committing crimes against humanity in Haiti. This case, Francisque v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), serves as a stark reminder of how past associations can cast long shadows over immigration aspirations.

Read More
Pregnancy Pause: Procedural Fairness Prevails in Work Permit Refusal.

Pregnancy Pause: Procedural Fairness Prevails in Work Permit Refusal.

The Federal Court on May 6,2025 overturned the refusal of an open work permit for Munashe Sungai, whose application to join his spouse, a student in Canada, was denied based on a flawed assessment. The Visa Officer relied on outdated information from a student compliance portal indicating the spouse was no longer enrolled full-time, failing to consider her approved pregnancy leave. Justice Régimbald found this constituted a breach of procedural fairness, as the Officer did not give Mr. Sungai an opportunity to explain the discrepancy before making a decision based on inaccurate information. The Court emphasized that while the onus is on applicants to provide necessary information, officers have a duty to seek clarification when concerns arise about the accuracy of submitted details.

Read More
Not the End of the Road: What Happens After a Refused Refugee Claim in Canada?

Not the End of the Road: What Happens After a Refused Refugee Claim in Canada?

Getting a "no" on your refugee claim or permanent resident application in Canada can feel like a dead end. But don't lose hope! Canada has a few paths you might still be able to take. This simple guide will walk you through some of your options to stay safe in Canada, illustrated by a recent case highlighting the importance of proper assessment.

Read More