Federal Court Quashes Study Permit Refusal Over Unjustified Officer Decision

On August 6, 2025, the Federal Court set aside IRCC’s refusal of Omone Bridget Ekong’s study permit. Justice Duchesne held that the officer’s conclusion that her education in Canada was “unnecessary” and her intent to stay was questionable ignored important facts in the record. The applicant had detailed her plan to return to Nigeria to take up a new senior role, continue running her businesses, and reunite with her children.

The Court emphasized that officers must assess both “push” and “pull” factors and address evidence that contradicts their findings. The decision was remitted for reconsideration, with the applicant allowed to submit updated documents.

Key Takeaway:
Study permit refusals must be justified with reasons that engage with the applicant’s evidence especially when that evidence strongly supports temporary intent.

Full Decision Here

Previous
Previous

Fraudulent Bank Statement Leads to Refusal of Work Permit in Misra v. Canada

Next
Next

Federal Court Rules Immigration Officer Applied Wrong Standard in H&C Case