Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While we strive to keep the information accurate and up to date, Canadian immigration laws and policies are subject to change without notice. No visitor to this site should act or refrain from acting based on the content herein without first seeking appropriate professional advice from a licensed immigration consultant or lawyer.
Using this website or reading its content does not create a consultant–client relationship with Arrowhood Immigration Services Inc. If you have specific questions about your immigration situation, please contact us directly for a personalized consultation.
Denied Sanctuary: One Man's Fight for Refugee Status While His Family Finds Safety
The path to refuge in Canada is rarely straightforward, and the recent Federal Court decision in Aslam v. Canada (Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship), 2025 FC 655, starkly illustrates this complexity. While his wife and children were granted the sanctuary they sought, Mr. Aslam's claim was denied based on the contentious concept of an Internal Flight Alternative (IFA). This case delves into the intricacies of IFA assessments, the stringent rules surrounding new evidence at the appeal stage, and the challenging reality faced by a self-represented litigant navigating Canada's refugee protection system. Join us as we explore the key takeaways from Aslam and what it means for individuals seeking safety and family unity in Canada.
Navigating the Narrow Path: Understanding Deferral of Removal in Canada - Insights from Nam v. Canada (2025 FC 720)
The core of the Court's decision to order a redetermination lay in the Officer's inadequate assessment of the applicant's mental health. The case emphasizes that when mental health is presented as a reason for deferral, the evidence must be comprehensive and directly link the act of removal to a significant deterioration of the individual's well-being, potentially leading to self-harm. Simply stating a diagnosis is insufficient. The evidence must articulate how removal, specifically, would have a severe negative impact beyond the typical stress associated with such proceedings.
The Importance of Perseverance, Proper Documentation, and Patience in Immigration Applications.
In D'Souza v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 682, the Court reinforced the importance of perseverance and proper documentation in immigration applications.
Not the End of the Road: What Happens After a Refused Refugee Claim in Canada?
Getting a "no" on your refugee claim or permanent resident application in Canada can feel like a dead end. But don't lose hope! Canada has a few paths you might still be able to take. This simple guide will walk you through some of your options to stay safe in Canada, illustrated by a recent case highlighting the importance of proper assessment.