Disclaimer
The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While we strive to keep the information accurate and up to date, Canadian immigration laws and policies are subject to change without notice. No visitor to this site should act or refrain from acting based on the content herein without first seeking appropriate professional advice from a licensed immigration consultant or lawyer.
Using this website or reading its content does not create a consultant–client relationship with Arrowhood Immigration Services Inc. If you have specific questions about your immigration situation, please contact us directly for a personalized consultation.

Shadows of the Past: The Francisque Immigration Case and Crimes Against Humanity
The Federal Court, in a decision dated May 2, 2025, upheld the refusal of permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate (H&C) grounds for Renold Francisque, a citizen of Haiti. The crux of the matter? A prior self-declaration of affiliation with the notorious "TonTon Macoutes" (TM), a group with a dark history of committing crimes against humanity in Haiti. This case, Francisque v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), serves as a stark reminder of how past associations can cast long shadows over immigration aspirations.

Pregnancy Pause: Procedural Fairness Prevails in Work Permit Refusal.
The Federal Court on May 6,2025 overturned the refusal of an open work permit for Munashe Sungai, whose application to join his spouse, a student in Canada, was denied based on a flawed assessment. The Visa Officer relied on outdated information from a student compliance portal indicating the spouse was no longer enrolled full-time, failing to consider her approved pregnancy leave. Justice Régimbald found this constituted a breach of procedural fairness, as the Officer did not give Mr. Sungai an opportunity to explain the discrepancy before making a decision based on inaccurate information. The Court emphasized that while the onus is on applicants to provide necessary information, officers have a duty to seek clarification when concerns arise about the accuracy of submitted details.

The Importance of Perseverance, Proper Documentation, and Patience in Immigration Applications.
In D'Souza v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 682, the Court reinforced the importance of perseverance and proper documentation in immigration applications.

The Steep Price of Overstaying: Lessons from Singh v. Canada
Singh v. Canada (2025 FC 705) highlights the harsh consequences of overstaying in Canada. Despite efforts to regain status, Mr. Singh was found inadmissible for non-compliance, and the Court upheld the decision—reminding all that legal status is non-negotiable in immigration matters.

Not the End of the Road: What Happens After a Refused Refugee Claim in Canada?
Getting a "no" on your refugee claim or permanent resident application in Canada can feel like a dead end. But don't lose hope! Canada has a few paths you might still be able to take. This simple guide will walk you through some of your options to stay safe in Canada, illustrated by a recent case highlighting the importance of proper assessment.


The Importance of Meeting Deadlines in Immigration Applications
A recent Federal Court case highlights the serious consequences of missing immigration deadlines. In Saffar v. Canada (2025 FC 645), one missed payment led to the refusal of four permanent residence applications. Learn why timing is everything — and how Arrowhood Immigration Services helps you stay on track.